Brain games have been the subject of much controversy due to their unclear effectiveness in maintaining mental fitness among users. Many are asking, “Do these games really make people smarter?” I say that the real question is “Are these games better than traditional methods?” For example, the Alzheimer’s Association recommends games like Brain Age, but they also recommend general puzzle therapy to patients. Some researchers have taken notice, including cognitive psychologist Alain Lieruy of the University of Rennes in Brittany, France. His recent study of 10-year-olds concluded that Nintendo’s brain games aren’t what they claim to be. Yes, kids use their brains while playing Big Brain Academy and Brain Training on Nintendo DS, but not any more than doing homework, reading, or playing paper-and-pencil games like sudoku.
Professor Lieruy chose to test 10-year-olds for his study because “That’s the age where you have the best chance of improvement. If it doesn’t work on children, it won’t work on adults.” Sixty-seven 10-year-olds were split into four groups:
Each group was tested on three skills before and after their assigned seven week courses:
Here were the results:
Most of the press interpreted the results of this study as negative. I actually think this is a positive thing for brain games as far as math skills are concerned. Brain games are just as good as doing math homework. Awesome! However, most brain games take pride on sharpening brains, “rejuvenating gray cells.” That means improving memory. Too bad kids who played on the DS had worse memory than when they started. In reality, this study tells us that more research needs to be done on the effectiveness of brain games. Do brain games really make people smarter? More data is needed to really answer this question.
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL